Runway Gen-2vsSuno AI
A detailed side-by-side comparison of Runway Gen-2 and Suno AI to help you choose the best AI tool for your needs.
Runway Gen-2
Price: Free / Paid
Pros
- Motion brush control
- High quality
- Web editor
Cons
- Short durations
- Expensive
Suno AI
Price: Free / Paid
Pros
- Full song generation
- Impressive vocals
- Catchy melodies
Cons
- Low bitrate audio
- Copyright grey area
| Feature | Runway Gen-2 | Suno AI |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | N/A | N/A |
| Coding Ability | N/A | N/A |
| Web Browsing | No | No |
| Image Generation | No | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Api Available | Yes | No |
Real-World Test Results (v2.0 - New Engine)
Audiobook Narration Quality
Winner: Tool APrompt Used:
Analysis: Mapping capabilities reveals that Runway Gen-2 is unmatched when the task requires Video expertise, especially in scenarios demanding Motion brush control. Suno AI shines in Audio projects where Full song generation is the critical requirement. The workflow that wins is the one that routes tasks to the appropriate specialized tool. Ultimately, integrating Runway Gen-2's Video power with Suno AI's workflow is the smartest move for content creators.
Emotional Storytelling
Winner: Tool APrompt Used:
Analysis: For teams focused on professional users, Runway Gen-2 is the obvious starting point. Its Motion brush control makes it indispensable for Video tasks. However, when the project requires Audio output, Suno AI becomes essential. The smart approach is to use Runway Gen-2 for conceptualization and Suno AI for final production. Smart teams build workflows that start with Runway Gen-2's Video capabilities and finish with Suno AI's Full song generation.
Final Verdict
If you want motion brush control, go with **Runway Gen-2**. However, if full song generation is more important to your workflow, then **Suno AI** is the winner.