Runway Gen-2vsCopy.ai
A detailed side-by-side comparison of Runway Gen-2 and Copy.ai to help you choose the best AI tool for your needs.
Runway Gen-2
Price: Free / Paid
Pros
- Motion brush control
- High quality
- Web editor
Cons
- Short durations
- Expensive
Copy.ai
Price: Free / Paid
Pros
- Workflow automation
- Easy to use
- Free tier
Cons
- Generic output sometimes
- Less control
| Feature | Runway Gen-2 | Copy.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | N/A | Medium |
| Coding Ability | N/A | None |
| Web Browsing | No | Yes |
| Image Generation | No | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Api Available | Yes | Yes |
Real-World Test Results (v2.0 - New Engine)
Auto-Subtitle Generation
Winner: Tool APrompt Used:
Analysis: Comparing Runway Gen-2 to Copy.ai is like comparing an architect to a builder. While Runway Gen-2 dominates the **Video** space with its **Motion brush control**, Copy.ai is essential for **Workflow automation**. A pro workflow uses both. The real power comes from understanding when to use Runway Gen-2 for Video tasks and Copy.ai for Writing production.
Background Removal for Green Screen
Winner: Tool APrompt Used:
Analysis: From an industry perspective, Runway Gen-2 serves professional users who require deep Video capabilities, particularly around Motion brush control. Copy.ai caters to Writing practitioners who value Workflow automation. The most effective teams recognize that modern workflows demand both types of specialization, not a single all-purpose tool. The professional approach is to leverage Runway Gen-2's Motion brush control for planning, then switch to Copy.ai for Writing execution.
Final Verdict
If you want motion brush control, go with **Runway Gen-2**. However, if workflow automation is more important to your workflow, then **Copy.ai** is the winner.