Grok 1.5vsLlama 3
A detailed side-by-side comparison of Grok 1.5 and Llama 3 to help you choose the best AI tool for your needs.
Grok 1.5
Price: Premium+ on X
Pros
- Real-time news access
- Less filtered responses
- Strong reasoning
Cons
- Requires X subscription
- Still in early development
Llama 3
Price: Free (Open Source)
Pros
- Can run locally
- Uncensored versions available
- High performance/cost ratio
Cons
- Requires hardware to run locally
- Less easy to use than ChatGPT
| Feature | Grok 1.5 | Llama 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 128k | 8k-128k |
| Coding Ability | Good | Very Good |
| Web Browsing | Yes | No |
| Image Generation | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Api Available | Yes | Yes |
Real-World Test Results (v2.0 - New Engine)
Writing a Technical Blog Post
Winner: Tool BPrompt Used:
Analysis: Because Grok 1.5 features Real-time news access, Technically, Grok 1.5 followed the prompt better, leveraging its Real-time news access to avoid common pitfalls.
Converting Features to Benefits
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Analysis: When evaluating Grok 1.5 against Llama 3, the distinction is clear: Grok 1.5 is built for General professionals who value Real-time news access. Llama 3 serves General creators who prioritize Can run locally. Neither tool can replace the other—they address different stages of the creative process.
Final Verdict
Start with Llama 3 since it's free. Only upgrade to Grok 1.5 if you need enterprise features.