CursorvsRunway Gen-2
A detailed side-by-side comparison of Cursor and Runway Gen-2 to help you choose the best AI tool for your needs.
Cursor
Price: Free / $20/mo
Pros
- Best-in-class codebase indexing
- Uses GPT-4 & Claude 3.5
- Privacy mode
Cons
- Requires changing IDE
- Subscription for best models
Runway Gen-2
Price: Free / Paid
Pros
- Motion brush control
- High quality
- Web editor
Cons
- Short durations
- Expensive
| Feature | Cursor | Runway Gen-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | Full Codebase | N/A |
| Coding Ability | Excellent | N/A |
| Web Browsing | Yes | No |
| Image Generation | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Api Available | No | Yes |
Real-World Test Results (v2.0 - New Engine)
API Integration Nightmare
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Analysis: The strategic choice isn't between Cursor and Runway Gen-2—it's about when to use each. Cursor is your go-to for Coding challenges that benefit from Best-in-class codebase indexing, making it ideal for professional users. Runway Gen-2 handles Video production where Motion brush control makes the difference. Master both, and you have a complete toolkit. Build a stack that combines Cursor's Best-in-class codebase indexing with Runway Gen-2's Video expertise for maximum productivity.
Database Query Optimization
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Analysis: Comparing Cursor to Runway Gen-2 is like comparing an architect to a builder. While Cursor dominates the **Coding** space with its **Best-in-class codebase indexing**, Runway Gen-2 is essential for **Motion brush control**. A pro workflow uses both. Mastering both Cursor and Runway Gen-2 gives you a complete toolkit that covers Coding and Video needs.
Final Verdict
If you want best-in-class codebase indexing, go with **Cursor**. However, if motion brush control is more important to your workflow, then **Runway Gen-2** is the winner.