CursorvsAdobe Firefly
A detailed side-by-side comparison of Cursor and Adobe Firefly to help you choose the best AI tool for your needs.
Cursor
Price: Free / $20/mo
Pros
- Best-in-class codebase indexing
- Uses GPT-4 & Claude 3.5
- Privacy mode
Cons
- Requires changing IDE
- Subscription for best models
Adobe Firefly
Price: Free / Credit based
Pros
- Commercially safe
- Photoshop integration
- High quality
Cons
- Strict filters
- Credits burn fast
| Feature | Cursor | Adobe Firefly |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | Full Codebase | N/A |
| Coding Ability | Excellent | N/A |
| Web Browsing | Yes | No |
| Image Generation | No | Yes |
| Multimodal | No | No |
| Api Available | No | Yes |
Real-World Test Results (v2.0 - New Engine)
Finding Memory Leaks
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Analysis: Cursor has established itself as a leader in Coding through its mastery of Best-in-class codebase indexing. Adobe Firefly dominates Design workflows with its superior Commercially safe. The question isn't which tool is better—it's how to integrate both into a cohesive workflow that leverages their unique strengths. Mastering both Cursor and Adobe Firefly gives you a complete toolkit that covers Coding and Design needs.
Docker Multi-Stage Build Optimization
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Analysis: Comparing Cursor to Adobe Firefly is like comparing an architect to a builder. While Cursor dominates the **Coding** space with its **Best-in-class codebase indexing**, Adobe Firefly is essential for **Commercially safe**. A pro workflow uses both. The professional approach is to leverage Cursor's Best-in-class codebase indexing for planning, then switch to Adobe Firefly for Design execution.
Final Verdict
If you want best-in-class codebase indexing, go with **Cursor**. However, if commercially safe is more important to your workflow, then **Adobe Firefly** is the winner.