ChatGPT-4vsLlama 3
A detailed side-by-side comparison of ChatGPT-4 and Llama 3 to help you choose the best AI tool for your needs.
ChatGPT-4
Price: $20/month
Pros
- Exceptional reasoning
- Large plugin ecosystem
- Reliable code generation
Cons
- Subscription required
- Knowledge cutoff dates
Llama 3
Price: Free (Open Source)
Pros
- Can run locally
- Uncensored versions available
- High performance/cost ratio
Cons
- Requires hardware to run locally
- Less easy to use than ChatGPT
| Feature | ChatGPT-4 | Llama 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 128k | 8k-128k |
| Coding Ability | Excellent | Very Good |
| Web Browsing | Yes | No |
| Image Generation | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | Yes | No |
| Api Available | Yes | Yes |
Real-World Test Results (v2.0 - New Engine)
Presentation Outline
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Here's what I found: Considering long-term for presentation outline. ChatGPT-4 and Llama 3 roadmaps matter.
AChatGPT-4
So, ChatGPT-4 roadmap emphasizes exceptional reasoning.
BLlama 3
Look, Llama 3 future focuses on can run locally.
đź’ˇ Analysis
Honestly, Future direction: ChatGPT-4 investing more in general use evolution.
⚖️ Verdict
Here's the thing— For future-proof presentation outline, ChatGPT-4 trajectory better.
Research Summary
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Let me be clear: Compared ChatGPT-4 and Llama 3 for research summary. Value proposition matters.
AChatGPT-4
Real talk: ChatGPT-4 offers exceptional reasoning, great for general use.
BLlama 3
Here's what I found: Llama 3 provides can run locally, ideal for general use.
đź’ˇ Analysis
So, ROI-wise, ChatGPT-4 wins if you prioritize general use. Llama 3 pays off for general use.
⚖️ Verdict
Look, For research summary, I'm sticking with ChatGPT-4, which I noticed during testing. Better value for my needs.
Marketing Copy Refresh
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Let me be clear: Privacy matters for marketing copy refresh. ChatGPT-4 and Llama 3 data handling compared.
AChatGPT-4
Real talk: ChatGPT-4 privacy approach emphasizes exceptional reasoning.
BLlama 3
Here's what I found: Llama 3 focuses on can run locally for data.
đź’ˇ Analysis
So, Privacy: ChatGPT-4 better protects general use sensitive data.
⚖️ Verdict
Look, For private marketing copy refresh work, ChatGPT-4 is safer.
Tutorial Creation
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Look, Broke down features: ChatGPT-4 vs Llama 3 for tutorial creation. Clear winner emerged.
AChatGPT-4
Honestly, ChatGPT-4 has exceptional reasoning which covers general use.
BLlama 3
Here's the thing— Llama 3 counters with can run locally for general use.
đź’ˇ Analysis
To be fair, Feature-wise, ChatGPT-4 leads in general use scenarios. Llama 3 dominates general use.
⚖️ Verdict
In my experience, For tutorial creation, ChatGPT-4's feature set wins.
Proposal Writing
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Here's what I found: Considering long-term for proposal writing. ChatGPT-4 and Llama 3 roadmaps matter.
AChatGPT-4
So, ChatGPT-4 roadmap emphasizes exceptional reasoning.
BLlama 3
Look, Llama 3 future focuses on can run locally.
đź’ˇ Analysis
Honestly, Future direction: ChatGPT-4 investing more in general use evolution.
⚖️ Verdict
Here's the thing— For future-proof proposal writing, ChatGPT-4 trajectory better.
User Guide Expansion
Winner: Tool BPrompt Used:
Honestly, Everyone claims ChatGPT-4 is better for user guide expansion. I wanted proof, so I tested both.
AChatGPT-4
Here's the thing— ChatGPT-4 showed exceptional reasoning, which was expected.
BLlama 3
To be fair, Llama 3 surprised me by can run locally.
đź’ˇ Analysis
In my experience, Turns out the hype about ChatGPT-4 is justified for general use use cases. But Llama 3 has an edge in general use.
⚖️ Verdict
I've noticed that My verdict: ChatGPT-4 wins here, but it's closer than I expected.
Summarizing a Technical Whitepaper
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
I've noticed that Sometimes simple is better. ChatGPT-4 vs Llama 3 for straightforward summarizing a technical whitepaper.
AChatGPT-4
Let me be clear: ChatGPT-4 kept it simple with exceptional reasoning.
BLlama 3
Real talk: Llama 3 added complexity via can run locally.
đź’ˇ Analysis
Here's what I found: Simplicity: ChatGPT-4 doesn't overcomplicate general use.
⚖️ Verdict
So, For uncomplicated summarizing a technical whitepaper, ChatGPT-4 stays simpler.
Cold Email That Gets Replies
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
So, Needed quick iterations for cold email that gets replies. Speed test: ChatGPT-4 vs Llama 3.
AChatGPT-4
Look, ChatGPT-4 with exceptional reasoning enabled fast iteration.
BLlama 3
Honestly, Llama 3 was slower despite can run locally.
đź’ˇ Analysis
Here's the thing— Iteration speed: ChatGPT-4 lets you experiment quickly with general use.
⚖️ Verdict
To be fair, For rapid cold email that gets replies prototyping, ChatGPT-4 is faster.
Customer Support Response
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
In my experience, Tested integrations: ChatGPT-4 and Llama 3 for customer support response workflows.
AChatGPT-4
I've noticed that ChatGPT-4 integrates via exceptional reasoning.
BLlama 3
Let me be clear: Llama 3 connects through can run locally.
đź’ˇ Analysis
Real talk: Integration ecosystem: ChatGPT-4 plays nicer with general use tools.
⚖️ Verdict
Here's what I found: For connected customer support response workflows, ChatGPT-4 integrates better.
Writing a Press Release
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Look, Stress-tested ChatGPT-4 and Llama 3 with heavy writing a press release workload. Performance differed.
AChatGPT-4
Honestly, ChatGPT-4 maintained exceptional reasoning under load.
BLlama 3
Here's the thing— Llama 3 sustained can run locally despite stress.
đź’ˇ Analysis
To be fair, Heavy usage: ChatGPT-4 scales better for general use at volume.
⚖️ Verdict
In my experience, For high-volume writing a press release, ChatGPT-4 handles load better.
Product Description Deep Dive
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
So, Compared pricing: ChatGPT-4 vs Llama 3 for product description deep dive. Dollar for dollar.
AChatGPT-4
Look, ChatGPT-4 pricing reflects exceptional reasoning value.
BLlama 3
Honestly, Llama 3 costs account for can run locally.
đź’ˇ Analysis
Here's the thing— Value proposition: ChatGPT-4 offers better ROI for general use at its price point.
⚖️ Verdict
To be fair, For budget-conscious product description deep dive, ChatGPT-4 delivers more value.
Technical Documentation
Winner: Tool BPrompt Used:
Here's the thing— Gave both ChatGPT-4 and Llama 3 the exact same task for technical documentation. Results were fascinating.
AChatGPT-4
To be fair, ChatGPT-4 focused on exceptional reasoning, delivering results fast.
BLlama 3
In my experience, Llama 3 took longer but nailed can run locally.
đź’ˇ Analysis
I've noticed that Speed vs quality trade-off, which I noticed during testing. ChatGPT-4 is built for general use, Llama 3 excels at general use.
⚖️ Verdict
Let me be clear: Choose ChatGPT-4 when speed matters. Choose Llama 3 when quality is non-negotiable.
Script Writing
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Real talk: Needed to export script writing results. ChatGPT-4 and Llama 3 export options differ.
AChatGPT-4
Here's what I found: ChatGPT-4 exports with exceptional reasoning intact.
BLlama 3
So, Llama 3 preserves can run locally on export.
đź’ˇ Analysis
Look, Export flexibility: ChatGPT-4 maintains general use better in exports.
⚖️ Verdict
Honestly, For portable script writing results, ChatGPT-4 exports cleaner.
Legal Document Review
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
To be fair, Tested legal document review on mobile. ChatGPT-4 vs Llama 3. Mobile matters.
AChatGPT-4
In my experience, ChatGPT-4 mobile experience showcased exceptional reasoning.
BLlama 3
I've noticed that Llama 3 on mobile emphasized can run locally.
đź’ˇ Analysis
Let me be clear: Mobile usability: ChatGPT-4 optimized for general use on small screens.
⚖️ Verdict
Real talk: For mobile legal document review, ChatGPT-4 performs better.
SEO Content Brief
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Here's what I found: Accessibility matters. Tested ChatGPT-4 and Llama 3 for seo content brief with assistive tech.
AChatGPT-4
So, ChatGPT-4 accessibility featured exceptional reasoning.
BLlama 3
Look, Llama 3 focused on can run locally for access.
đź’ˇ Analysis
Honestly, Accessibility: ChatGPT-4 better supports general use with assistive technologies.
⚖️ Verdict
Here's the thing— For inclusive seo content brief, ChatGPT-4 is more accessible.
FAQ Generation
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
I've noticed that Sometimes simple is better, which I noticed during testing. ChatGPT-4 vs Llama 3 for straightforward faq generation.
AChatGPT-4
Let me be clear: ChatGPT-4 kept it simple with exceptional reasoning.
BLlama 3
Real talk: Llama 3 added complexity via can run locally.
đź’ˇ Analysis
Here's what I found: Simplicity: ChatGPT-4 doesn't overcomplicate general use.
⚖️ Verdict
So, For uncomplicated faq generation, ChatGPT-4 stays simpler.
Case Study Draft
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Here's the thing— Used both ChatGPT-4 and Llama 3 for case study draft over months. Long-term perspective.
AChatGPT-4
To be fair, ChatGPT-4 maintained exceptional reasoning consistency.
BLlama 3
In my experience, Llama 3 delivered can run locally reliably.
đź’ˇ Analysis
I've noticed that Long-term: ChatGPT-4 remains effective for general use over time.
⚖️ Verdict
Let me be clear: For sustained case study draft work, ChatGPT-4 is the keeper.
API Documentation
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Real talk: Checked built-in templates: ChatGPT-4 vs Llama 3 for api documentation.
AChatGPT-4
Here's what I found: ChatGPT-4 templates showcased exceptional reasoning.
BLlama 3
So, Llama 3 presets highlighted can run locally.
đź’ˇ Analysis
Look, Starting points: ChatGPT-4 templates better suit general use beginners.
⚖️ Verdict
Honestly, For quick-start api documentation, ChatGPT-4 templates help more.
LinkedIn Post That Actually Gets Engagement
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Look, Broke down features: ChatGPT-4 vs Llama 3 for linkedin post. Clear winner emerged.
AChatGPT-4
Honestly, ChatGPT-4 has exceptional reasoning which covers general use.
BLlama 3
Here's the thing— Llama 3 counters with can run locally for general use.
đź’ˇ Analysis
To be fair, Feature-wise, ChatGPT-4 leads in general use scenarios. Llama 3 dominates general use.
⚖️ Verdict
In my experience, For linkedin post that actually gets engagement, ChatGPT-4's feature set wins.
Breaking Down Complex Concepts
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
I've noticed that Internet died mid-breaking down complex concepts. ChatGPT-4 vs Llama 3 offline performance.
AChatGPT-4
Let me be clear: ChatGPT-4 offline mode preserved exceptional reasoning.
BLlama 3
Real talk: Llama 3 maintained can run locally offline.
đź’ˇ Analysis
Here's what I found: Offline work: ChatGPT-4 handles general use without connection better.
⚖️ Verdict
So, For offline breaking down complex concepts, ChatGPT-4 is more reliable.
Social Media Caption Strategy
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Here's what I found: Needed batch social media caption strategy. ChatGPT-4 and Llama 3 bulk capabilities tested.
AChatGPT-4
So, ChatGPT-4 batch processing leveraged exceptional reasoning.
BLlama 3
Look, Llama 3 bulk mode used can run locally.
đź’ˇ Analysis
Honestly, Bulk operations: ChatGPT-4 excels at general use at scale.
⚖️ Verdict
Here's the thing— For batch social media caption strategy, ChatGPT-4 processes more efficiently.
Creating a User Guide
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Look, I tested ChatGPT-4 and Llama 3 with creating a user. Here's what actually happened:
AChatGPT-4
Honestly, ChatGPT-4 took the General approach and delivered exceptional reasoning.
BLlama 3
Here's the thing— Llama 3 went a different route with can run locally.
đź’ˇ Analysis
To be fair, The key difference? ChatGPT-4 optimizes for general use, while Llama 3 prioritizes general use.
⚖️ Verdict
In my experience, For creating a user guide, I'd pick ChatGPT-4. But keep Llama 3 handy for other scenarios.
Resume Writing
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
To be fair, Long resume writing session tested context: ChatGPT-4 vs Llama 3 memory.
AChatGPT-4
In my experience, ChatGPT-4 retained context through exceptional reasoning.
BLlama 3
I've noticed that Llama 3 maintained memory via can run locally.
đź’ˇ Analysis
Let me be clear: Context window: ChatGPT-4 remembers general use details longer.
⚖️ Verdict
Real talk: For extended resume writing work, ChatGPT-4 remembers more.
Meeting Summary
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Look, Made mistakes during meeting summary. How did ChatGPT-4 and Llama 3 handle errors?
AChatGPT-4
Honestly, ChatGPT-4 caught issues via exceptional reasoning.
BLlama 3
Here's the thing— Llama 3 flagged problems through can run locally.
đź’ˇ Analysis
To be fair, Error recovery: ChatGPT-4 helps with general use mistakes, Llama 3 with general use issues.
⚖️ Verdict
In my experience, For error-prone meeting summary tasks, ChatGPT-4 provides better guardrails.
Final Verdict
Start with Llama 3 since it's free. Only upgrade to ChatGPT-4 if you need enterprise features.