CodeWhisperervsRunway Gen-2
A detailed side-by-side comparison of CodeWhisperer and Runway Gen-2 to help you choose the best AI tool for your needs.
CodeWhisperer
Price: Free for Individuals
Pros
- Free for individual use
- Great for AWS services
- Security scans
Cons
- Less general purpose
- AWS focused
Runway Gen-2
Price: Free / Paid
Pros
- Motion brush control
- High quality
- Web editor
Cons
- Short durations
- Expensive
| Feature | CodeWhisperer | Runway Gen-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | Medium | N/A |
| Coding Ability | Good | N/A |
| Web Browsing | No | No |
| Image Generation | No | No |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Api Available | No | Yes |
Real-World Test Results (v2.0 - New Engine)
Migrating from jQuery to React
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Analysis: Think of CodeWhisperer as your strategic planning tool—it handles the Coding layer through its Free for individual use capabilities. Runway Gen-2, on the other hand, executes the Video vision with precision. For professional users workflows, you'd start with CodeWhisperer and finish with Runway Gen-2. Smart teams build workflows that start with CodeWhisperer's Coding capabilities and finish with Runway Gen-2's Motion brush control.
Building a Custom Hook from Scratch
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Analysis: From an industry perspective, CodeWhisperer serves professional users who require deep Coding capabilities, particularly around Free for individual use. Runway Gen-2 caters to Video practitioners who value Motion brush control. The most effective teams recognize that modern workflows demand both types of specialization, not a single all-purpose tool. Build a stack that combines CodeWhisperer's Free for individual use with Runway Gen-2's Video expertise for maximum productivity.
Final Verdict
If you want free for individual use, go with **CodeWhisperer**. However, if motion brush control is more important to your workflow, then **Runway Gen-2** is the winner.