Adobe FireflyvsRunway Gen-2
A detailed side-by-side comparison of Adobe Firefly and Runway Gen-2 to help you choose the best AI tool for your needs.
Adobe Firefly
Price: Free / Credit based
Pros
- Commercially safe
- Photoshop integration
- High quality
Cons
- Strict filters
- Credits burn fast
Runway Gen-2
Price: Free / Paid
Pros
- Motion brush control
- High quality
- Web editor
Cons
- Short durations
- Expensive
| Feature | Adobe Firefly | Runway Gen-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | N/A | N/A |
| Coding Ability | N/A | N/A |
| Web Browsing | No | No |
| Image Generation | Yes | No |
| Multimodal | No | Yes |
| Api Available | Yes | Yes |
Real-World Test Results (v2.0 - New Engine)
Text in Images (The Eternal Struggle)
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Analysis: Adobe Firefly has established itself as a leader in Design through its mastery of Commercially safe. Runway Gen-2 dominates Video workflows with its superior Motion brush control. The question isn't which tool is better—it's how to integrate both into a cohesive workflow that leverages their unique strengths. Mastering both Adobe Firefly and Runway Gen-2 gives you a complete toolkit that covers Design and Video needs.
Architecture Visualization
Winner: DrawPrompt Used:
Analysis: Adobe Firefly has established itself as a leader in Design through its mastery of Commercially safe. Runway Gen-2 dominates Video workflows with its superior Motion brush control. The question isn't which tool is better—it's how to integrate both into a cohesive workflow that leverages their unique strengths. Build a stack that combines Adobe Firefly's Commercially safe with Runway Gen-2's Video expertise for maximum productivity.
Final Verdict
If you want commercially safe, go with **Adobe Firefly**. However, if motion brush control is more important to your workflow, then **Runway Gen-2** is the winner.